Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation and 768MB VRAM GeForce GTX 460 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock2130MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 86.40GB/s)
2480 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 160W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Ada Generation +1223%
12 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 460
0.907 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2024
Release Date
Jul 2010
Quadro Ada
Generation
GeForce 400
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1620 MHz
Base Clock
-
2130 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
768MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
192bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
86.40GB/s

Render Config

22
SM Count
7
-
Compute Units
-
2816
Shading Units
336
88
TMUs
56
48
ROPs
24
88
Tensor Cores
-
22
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
12 MB
L2 Cache
384 KB

Theoretical Performance

102.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.450 GPixel/s
187.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
37.80 GTexel/s
12.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.00 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
907.2 GFLOPS
187.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
75.60 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
GF104
-
GPU Variant
GF104-300-KB-A1
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
1.95 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
332 mm²

Board Design

70W
TDP
160W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
2.1
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy