Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 635 OEM

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 635 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 635 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock2130MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
2432 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 635 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 70W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Ada Generation +1515%
12 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 635 OEM
0.743 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2024
Release Date
Oct 2013
Quadro Ada
Generation
GeForce 600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1620 MHz
Base Clock
-
2130 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s

Render Config

22
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
2816
Shading Units
384
88
TMUs
32
48
ROPs
8
88
Tensor Cores
-
22
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
12 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

102.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.736 GPixel/s
187.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.94 GTexel/s
12.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.00 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
742.7 GFLOPS
187.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
30.94 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
GK208
-
GPU Variant
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Kepler 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
1.02 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
87 mm²

Board Design

70W
TDP
35W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
8.9
CUDA
3.5
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy