Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 230

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 230

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation and 512MB VRAM GeForce GT 230 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock2130MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 57.60GB/s)
2768 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Ada Generation +7592%
12 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 230
0.156 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2024
Release Date
Oct 2009
Quadro Ada
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1620 MHz
Base Clock
-
2130 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
57.60GB/s

Render Config

22
SM Count
6
-
Compute Units
-
2816
Shading Units
48
88
TMUs
24
48
ROPs
16
88
Tensor Cores
-
22
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
12 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB

Theoretical Performance

102.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.40 GPixel/s
187.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.60 GTexel/s
12.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.00 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
156.0 GFLOPS
187.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
G94B
-
GPU Variant
G94-300-B1
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
55 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
0.505 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
196 mm²

Board Design

70W
TDP
75W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
1.1
6.7
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy