Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce 315 OEM

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce 315 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation and 1024MB VRAM GeForce 315 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 13 years late
Boost Clock2130MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 9.600GB/s)
2800 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 315 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (33W vs 70W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Ada Generation +26566%
12 TFLOPS
GeForce 315 OEM
0.045 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2024
Release Date
Feb 2011
Quadro Ada
Generation
GeForce 300
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1620 MHz
Base Clock
-
2130 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
600 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
9.600GB/s

Render Config

22
SM Count
2
-
Compute Units
-
2816
Shading Units
16
88
TMUs
8
48
ROPs
4
88
Tensor Cores
-
22
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
12 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB

Theoretical Performance

102.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.356 GPixel/s
187.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.712 GTexel/s
12.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.00 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
44.86 GFLOPS
187.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
GT218
-
GPU Variant
GT218-300-B1
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²

Board Design

70W
TDP
33W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
1.2
6.7
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy