Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce 210 PCI

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce 210 PCI

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation and 512MB VRAM GeForce 210 PCI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock2130MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
2800 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 210 PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 70W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Ada Generation +34185%
12 TFLOPS
GeForce 210 PCI
0.035 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2024
Release Date
Oct 2009
Quadro Ada
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCI

Clock Speeds

1620 MHz
Base Clock
-
2130 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

22
SM Count
2
-
Compute Units
-
2816
Shading Units
16
88
TMUs
8
48
ROPs
4
88
Tensor Cores
-
22
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
12 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB

Theoretical Performance

102.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.900 GPixel/s
187.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.800 GTexel/s
12.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.00 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
35.20 GFLOPS
187.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
GT216
-
GPU Variant
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
0.486 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²

Board Design

70W
TDP
31W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
1.2
6.7
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy