Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs AMD FirePro W4300

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs AMD FirePro W4300

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation and 4GB VRAM FirePro W4300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2130MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro W4300 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 70W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Ada Generation +740%
12 TFLOPS
FirePro W4300
1.428 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2024
Release Date
Dec 2015
Quadro Ada
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1620 MHz
Base Clock
-
2130 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

22
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
12
2816
Shading Units
768
88
TMUs
48
48
ROPs
16
88
Tensor Cores
-
22
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
12 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

102.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.88 GPixel/s
187.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
44.64 GTexel/s
12.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.00 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1428 GFLOPS
187.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
89.28 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
Bonaire
-
GPU Variant
Bonaire PRO GL
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
2.08 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
160 mm²

Board Design

70W
TDP
50W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy