Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs ATI FireGL V3600

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs ATI FireGL V3600

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation and 256MB VRAM FireGL V3600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 16 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock2130MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
2696 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 73W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Ada Generation +8233%
12 TFLOPS
FireGL V3600
0.144 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2024
Release Date
Jun 2007
Quadro Ada
Generation
FireGL
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1620 MHz
Base Clock
-
2130 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
16.00GB/s

Render Config

22
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
3
2816
Shading Units
120
88
TMUs
8
48
ROPs
4
88
Tensor Cores
-
22
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
12 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB

Theoretical Performance

102.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
187.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.800 GTexel/s
12.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.00 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
144.0 GFLOPS
187.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
RV630
-
GPU Variant
RV630 GL
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
65 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
0.39 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
153 mm²

Board Design

70W
TDP
73W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy