Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT vs AMD FirePro V5900

AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT vs AMD FirePro V5900

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM Radeon RX 6750 XT and 2GB VRAM FirePro V5900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock2600MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro V5900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon RX 6750 XT +2067%
13.31 TFLOPS
FirePro V5900
0.614 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2022
Release Date
May 2011
Navi II
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2150 MHz
Base Clock
-
2600 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

12GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
432.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
40
Compute Units
8
2560
Shading Units
512
160
TMUs
32
64
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
40
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
3 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

166.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.20 GPixel/s
416.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.20 GTexel/s
26.62 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
13.31 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
614.4 GFLOPS
832.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
153.6 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Navi 22
GPU Name
Cayman
Navi 22 KXT (215-127000144)
GPU Variant
Cayman LE WS
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale 3
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
40 nm
17.2 billion
Transistors
2.64 billion
335 mm²
Die Size
389 mm²

Board Design

250W
TDP
75W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.5
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy