Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon RX 6400 vs NVIDIA CMP 170HX

AMD Radeon RX 6400 vs NVIDIA CMP 170HX

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon RX 6400 and 16GB VRAM CMP 170HX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon RX 6400 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 65% (2321MHz vs 1410MHz)
Lower TDP (53W vs 250W)
NVIDIA CMP 170HX 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1493GB/s vs 128.0GB/s)
3712 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon RX 6400
3.565 TFLOPS
CMP 170HX +254%
12.63 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Sep 2021
Navi II
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4

Clock Speeds

1923 MHz
Base Clock
1140 MHz
2321 MHz
Boost Clock
1410 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1458 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM2e
64bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
128.0GB/s
Bandwidth
1493GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
70
12
Compute Units
-
768
Shading Units
4480
48
TMUs
280
32
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
280
12
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB

Theoretical Performance

74.27 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
180.5 GPixel/s
111.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
394.8 GTexel/s
7.130 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
50.53 TFLOPS
3.565 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.63 TFLOPS
222.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
6.317 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Navi 24
GPU Name
GA100
Navi 24 XL (215-135000046)
GPU Variant
GA100-105F-A1
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
7 nm
5.4 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
107 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²

Board Design

53W
TDP
250W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x HDMI 2.1 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
2.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
8.0
6.6
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy