Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon RX 5300 XT vs AMD Radeon R7 265

AMD Radeon RX 5300 XT vs AMD Radeon R7 265

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon RX 5300 XT and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 265 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon RX 5300 XT 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 99% (1845MHz vs 925MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
384 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (100W vs 150W)
AMD Radeon R7 265 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (179.2GB/s vs 112.0GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon RX 5300 XT +174%
5.196 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 265
1.894 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2019
Release Date
Feb 2014
Navi
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1670 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
1845 MHz
Boost Clock
925 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1400 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
112.0GB/s
Bandwidth
179.2GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
22
Compute Units
16
1408
Shading Units
1024
88
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

59.04 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.60 GPixel/s
162.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
59.20 GTexel/s
10.39 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.196 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.894 TFLOPS
324.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
118.4 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Navi 14
GPU Name
Pitcairn
Navi 14 XL
GPU Variant
Pitcairn PRO (215-0828062)
RDNA 1.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
28 nm
6.4 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
158 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Board Design

100W
TDP
150W
300 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
6.5
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy