CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
VS
AMD Radeon R9 Nano
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 Nano and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R9 Nano 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 9 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
3880 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 's Advantages
Lower TDP (171W vs 175W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 Nano
+1428%
8.192 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
0.536 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 Nano
VS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
Graphics Card
Aug 2015
Release Date
Nov 2008
Pirate Islands
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
896MB
HBM
Memory Type
GDDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
448bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
27
64
Compute Units
-
4096
Shading Units
216
256
TMUs
72
64
ROPs
28
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
224 KB
Theoretical Performance
64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
256.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.47 GTexel/s
8.192 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.192 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
536.5 GFLOPS
512.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
67.07 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
Fiji
GPU Name
GT200B
Fiji XT CA (215-0862120)
GPU Variant
G200-103-B2
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²
Board Design
175W
TDP
171W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
6.3
Shader Model
4.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano
2
AMD Radeon HD 7450 OEM vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano
3
AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano
4
AMD Radeon HD 6450 OEM vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano
5
AMD Radeon R7 350X OEM vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano
6
NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GS Rev. 2 vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano
7
AMD Radeon RX 7990 XTX vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano
8
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA NVS 315
9
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT
10
AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs AMD Radeon HD 6450 OEM
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy