Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2

AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 Nano and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 Nano 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 9 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
3880 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 's Advantages
Lower TDP (171W vs 175W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 Nano +1428%
8.192 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
0.536 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2015
Release Date
Nov 2008
Pirate Islands
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
896MB
HBM
Memory Type
GDDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
448bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
27
64
Compute Units
-
4096
Shading Units
216
256
TMUs
72
64
ROPs
28
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
224 KB

Theoretical Performance

64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
256.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.47 GTexel/s
8.192 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.192 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
536.5 GFLOPS
512.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
67.07 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Fiji
GPU Name
GT200B
Fiji XT CA (215-0862120)
GPU Variant
G200-103-B2
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Board Design

175W
TDP
171W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
6.3
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy