Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition vs Intel Arc Pro A30M

AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition vs Intel Arc Pro A30M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition and 4GB VRAM Arc Pro A30M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (174.7GB/s vs 128.0GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
Intel Arc Pro A30M 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock2000MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Lower TDP (50W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition
2.989 TFLOPS
Arc Pro A30M +37%
4.096 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
Aug 2022
Crystal System
Generation
Alchemist
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1500 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2000 MHz
1365 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
174.7GB/s
Bandwidth
128.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
28
Compute Units
-
1792
Shading Units
1024
112
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
8
-
L1 Cache
-
-
L2 Cache
4 MB

Theoretical Performance

26.69 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
93.41 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
128.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.192 TFLOPS
2.989 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.096 TFLOPS
373.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1024 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Amethyst
GPU Name
DG2-128
Amethyst PRO (216-0872004)
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
5 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²

Board Design

250W
TDP
50W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
-
6.3
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy