Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 M385X vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation

AMD Radeon R9 M385X vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 M385X and 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 32% (1455MHz vs 1100MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
2176 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 M385X
1.971 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation +353%
8.94 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
Mar 2023
Gem System
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
930 MHz
1100 MHz
Boost Clock
1455 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
76.80GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
24
14
Compute Units
-
896
Shading Units
3072
56
TMUs
96
16
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
24
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB

Theoretical Performance

17.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
69.84 GPixel/s
61.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
139.7 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.940 TFLOPS
1.971 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.940 TFLOPS
123.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
139.7 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Strato
GPU Name
AD107
Strato XT
GPU Variant
-
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
35W
-
Suggested PSU
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
6.5
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy