Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce MX350

AMD Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce MX350

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition and 2GB VRAM GeForce MX350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 4% (975MHz vs 937MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (174.7GB/s vs 56.06GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce MX350 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 3 months late
Lower TDP (20W vs 80W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition +66%
1.997 TFLOPS
GeForce MX350
1.199 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2014
Release Date
Feb 2020
Crystal System
Generation
GeForce MX
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x4

Clock Speeds

850 MHz
Base Clock
747 MHz
975 MHz
Boost Clock
937 MHz
1365 MHz
Memory Clock
1752 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
174.7GB/s
Bandwidth
56.06GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
5
16
Compute Units
-
1024
Shading Units
640
64
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

31.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.99 GPixel/s
62.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
29.98 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
18.74 GFLOPS
1.997 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1199 GFLOPS
124.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
37.48 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
GP107
Pitcairn PRO (215-0828062)
GPU Variant
GP107-670-A1 (N17S-G5-A1)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
3.3 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
132 mm²

Board Design

80W
TDP
20W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy