Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 FURY X2 vs AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X2 vs AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 FURY X2 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 250 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X2 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
3712 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM 's Advantages
Boost Clock1050MHz

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 FURY X2 +967%
8.602 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 250 OEM
0.806 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Oct 2013
Pirate Islands
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1050 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM
Memory Type
DDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
32.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
64
Compute Units
6
4096
Shading Units
384
256
TMUs
24
64
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

67.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.400 GPixel/s
268.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.20 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
8.602 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
806.4 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
50.40 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Capsaicin
GPU Name
Oland
Capsaicin XT C9
GPU Variant
Oland XT (215-0837000)
GCN 3.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
65W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
6.5
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy