Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 290 vs ATI FirePro V3900

AMD Radeon R9 290 vs ATI FirePro V3900

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 290 and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V3900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 290 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
2080 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V3900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 275W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 290 +677%
4.849 TFLOPS
FirePro V3900
0.624 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2013
Release Date
Feb 2012
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
512bit
Memory Bus
128bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
40
Compute Units
6
2560
Shading Units
480
160
TMUs
24
64
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

60.61 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.200 GPixel/s
151.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.60 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
4.849 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
624.0 GFLOPS
606.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
Turks
Hawaii PRO (215-0852020)
GPU Variant
Turks GL
GCN 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
0.716 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Board Design

275W
TDP
50W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.3
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy