Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 285 vs ATI FireMV 2400 PCIe x1

AMD Radeon R9 285 vs ATI FireMV 2400 PCIe x1

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 285 and 64MB VRAM FireMV 2400 PCIe x1 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 285 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 8 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 6.496GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores
ATI FireMV 2400 PCIe x1 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 190W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2014
Release Date
Jan 2008
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FireMV Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x1

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
203 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
64MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
176.0GB/s
Bandwidth
6.496GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
28
Compute Units
-
1792
Shading Units
-
112
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

29.38 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.000 GPixel/s
102.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.000 GTexel/s
3.290 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.290 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
205.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Tonga
GPU Name
RV380
Tonga PRO (215-0851128)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Rage 9
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
130 nm
5 billion
Transistors
0.075 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
92 mm²

Board Design

190W
TDP
20W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x VHDCI
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
9.0
4.6
OpenGL
2.0
2.1
OpenCL
N/A
1.2.170
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.5
Shader Model
-

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy