Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 280 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 230

AMD Radeon R9 280 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 230

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280 and 512MB VRAM GeForce GT 230 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 280 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock933MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 57.60GB/s)
1744 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 230 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 200W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 280 +2043%
3.344 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 230
0.156 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2014
Release Date
Oct 2009
Volcanic Islands
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

827 MHz
Base Clock
-
933 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
57.60GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
6
28
Compute Units
-
1792
Shading Units
48
112
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB

Theoretical Performance

29.86 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.40 GPixel/s
104.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.60 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
3.344 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
156.0 GFLOPS
836.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
G94B
Tahiti PRO3 (215-0821330)
GPU Variant
G94-300-B1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
0.505 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
196 mm²

Board Design

200W
TDP
75W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 2x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy