Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 360 896SP vs ATI FirePro V7900

AMD Radeon R7 360 896SP vs ATI FirePro V7900

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 360 896SP and 2GB VRAM FirePro V7900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 360 896SP 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 1 months late
Lower TDP (85W vs 150W)
ATI FirePro V7900 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 360 896SP +6%
1.971 TFLOPS
FirePro V7900
1.856 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2015
Release Date
May 2011
Pirate Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
14
Compute Units
20
896
Shading Units
1280
56
TMUs
80
16
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

17.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.20 GPixel/s
61.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
58.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1.971 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.856 TFLOPS
123.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
464.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Tobago
GPU Name
Cayman
Tobago XT
GPU Variant
Cayman PRO GL
GCN 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale 3
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
2.64 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
389 mm²

Board Design

85W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.3
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy