Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon PRO W7900 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 5600

AMD Radeon PRO W7900 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 5600

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 48GB VRAM Radeon PRO W7900 and 1536MB VRAM Quadro FX 5600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon PRO W7900 's Advantages
Released 16 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock2495MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (864.0GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
6016 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 5600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (171W vs 295W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon PRO W7900 +17622%
61.32 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 5600
0.346 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2023
Release Date
Mar 2007
Radeon Pro Navi
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1855 MHz
Base Clock
-
2495 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

48GB
Memory Size
1536MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
864.0GB/s
Bandwidth
76.80GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
16
96
Compute Units
-
6144
Shading Units
128
384
TMUs
32
192
ROPs
24
-
Tensor Cores
-
96
RT Cores
-
256 KB per Array
L1 Cache
-
6 MB
L2 Cache
96 KB

Theoretical Performance

479.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.40 GPixel/s
958.1 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.40 GTexel/s
122.6 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
61.32 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
345.6 GFLOPS
1.916 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Navi 31
GPU Name
G80
Navi 31
GPU Variant
G80-875-A2
RDNA 3.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
90 nm
57.7 billion
Transistors
0.681 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
484 mm²

Board Design

295W
TDP
171W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
3x DisplayPort 2.1 1x mini-DisplayPort 2.1
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.2
OpenCL
1.1 (1.0)
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.0
6.7
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy