Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon PRO W7900 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800

AMD Radeon PRO W7900 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 48GB VRAM Radeon PRO W7900 and 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 3800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon PRO W7900 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock2495MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (864.0GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
5952 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (108W vs 295W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon PRO W7900 +13172%
61.32 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 3800
0.462 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2023
Release Date
Mar 2009
Radeon Pro Navi
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1855 MHz
Base Clock
-
2495 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

48GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
864.0GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
24
96
Compute Units
-
6144
Shading Units
192
384
TMUs
64
192
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
96
RT Cores
-
256 KB per Array
L1 Cache
-
6 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB

Theoretical Performance

479.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.600 GPixel/s
958.1 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.40 GTexel/s
122.6 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
61.32 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
462.3 GFLOPS
1.916 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
57.79 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Navi 31
GPU Name
GT200B
Navi 31
GPU Variant
G200-835-B2
RDNA 3.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
55 nm
57.7 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Board Design

295W
TDP
108W
600 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
3x DisplayPort 2.1 1x mini-DisplayPort 2.1
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
6.7
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy