Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon PRO W7700 vs AMD Radeon R9 280X

AMD Radeon PRO W7700 vs AMD Radeon R9 280X

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon PRO W7700 and 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon PRO W7700 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 160% (2600MHz vs 1000MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 288.0GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (190W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon PRO W7700 +680%
31.95 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 280X
4.096 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2023
Release Date
Oct 2013
Radeon Pro Navi
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1900 MHz
Base Clock
850 MHz
2600 MHz
Boost Clock
1000 MHz
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
576.0GB/s
Bandwidth
288.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
48
Compute Units
32
3072
Shading Units
2048
192
TMUs
128
96
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
48
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB

Theoretical Performance

249.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
32.00 GPixel/s
499.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
128.0 GTexel/s
63.90 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
31.95 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.096 TFLOPS
998.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1024 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Navi 32
GPU Name
Tahiti
Navi 32
GPU Variant
Tahiti XTL (215-0821065)
RDNA 3.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
28.1 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
346 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Board Design

190W
TDP
250W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
4x DisplayPort 2.1
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy