Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro W6900X vs AMD Radeon R7 240

AMD Radeon Pro W6900X vs AMD Radeon R7 240

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6900X and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 240 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro W6900X 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 176% (2150MHz vs 780MHz)
More VRAM (32GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
4800 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R7 240 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro W6900X +4312%
22.02 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 240
0.499 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2021
Release Date
Oct 2013
Radeon Pro Mac
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1825 MHz
Base Clock
730 MHz
2150 MHz
Boost Clock
780 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
80
Compute Units
5
5120
Shading Units
320
320
TMUs
20
128
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
80
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

275.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.240 GPixel/s
688.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.60 GTexel/s
44.03 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
22.02 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
499.2 GFLOPS
1376 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Navi 21
GPU Name
Oland
Navi 21 Pro-XTA
GPU Variant
Oland PRO (215-0837015)
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
28 nm
26.8 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Board Design

300W
TDP
30W
700 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.1 4x Thunderbolt
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
6.5
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy