Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro W6600M vs AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe

AMD Radeon Pro W6600M vs AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6600M and 4GB VRAM Radeon E9260 PCIe to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro W6600M 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 142% (2903MHz vs 1200MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 112.0GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon E9260 PCIe 's Advantages
Lower TDP (80W vs 90W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro W6600M +383%
10.4 TFLOPS
Radeon E9260 PCIe
2.15 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2021
Release Date
Sep 2016
Radeon Pro Mobile
Generation
Embedded
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

2200 MHz
Base Clock
1090 MHz
2903 MHz
Boost Clock
1200 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
112.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
28
Compute Units
14
1792
Shading Units
896
112
TMUs
48
64
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
28
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

185.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.20 GPixel/s
325.1 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
57.60 GTexel/s
20.81 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
2.150 TFLOPS
10.40 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.150 TFLOPS
650.3 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
134.4 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Navi 23
GPU Name
Baffin
-
GPU Variant
Baffin E9260 (216-0885288)
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
7 nm
Process Size
14 nm
11.06 billion
Transistors
3 billion
237 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Board Design

90W
TDP
80W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
-
6.5
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy