Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro W6400 vs AMD FirePro S7150 x2

AMD Radeon Pro W6400 vs AMD FirePro S7150 x2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6400 and 8GB VRAM FirePro S7150 x2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro W6400 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock2331MHz
Lower TDP (50W vs 265W)
AMD FirePro S7150 x2 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 112.0GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro W6400 +8%
3.58 TFLOPS
FirePro S7150 x2
3.297 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Feb 2016
Radeon Pro
Generation
FirePro Server
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2331 MHz
Base Clock
-
2331 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
112.0GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
12
Compute Units
28
768
Shading Units
1792
48
TMUs
112
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
12
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

74.59 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.44 GPixel/s
111.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
103.0 GTexel/s
7.161 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
3.297 TFLOPS
3.580 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.297 TFLOPS
223.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
206.1 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Navi 24
GPU Name
Tonga
Navi 24 XL-W
GPU Variant
Cloudy Tau
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5.4 billion
Transistors
5 billion
107 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²

Board Design

50W
TDP
265W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.2
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2.170
-
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy