Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon PRO W6300 vs NVIDIA T400 4 GB

AMD Radeon PRO W6300 vs NVIDIA T400 4 GB

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon PRO W6300 and 4GB VRAM T400 4 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon PRO W6300 's Advantages
Released 8 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 43% (2040MHz vs 1425MHz)
384 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (25W vs 30W)
NVIDIA T400 4 GB 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.00GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon PRO W6300 +186%
3.133 TFLOPS
T400 4 GB
1.094 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
May 2021
Radeon Pro Navi
Generation
Quadro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1512 MHz
Base Clock
420 MHz
2040 MHz
Boost Clock
1425 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
32bit
Memory Bus
64bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
80.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
6
12
Compute Units
-
768
Shading Units
384
48
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
12
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

65.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.80 GPixel/s
97.92 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
34.20 GTexel/s
6.267 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
2.189 TFLOPS
3.133 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1094 GFLOPS
195.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
34.20 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Navi 24
GPU Name
TU117
Navi 24
GPU Variant
-
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
12 nm
5.4 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
107 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Board Design

25W
TDP
30W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.7
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy