Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 vs NVIDIA GeForce MX230

AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 vs NVIDIA GeForce MX230

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro Vega 16 and 2GB VRAM GeForce MX230 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (307.2GB/s vs 48.06GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce MX230 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 29% (1531MHz vs 1190MHz)
Lower TDP (10W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro Vega 16 +210%
2.437 TFLOPS
GeForce MX230
0.784 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2018
Release Date
Feb 2019
Radeon Pro Mac
Generation
GeForce MX
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x4

Clock Speeds

815 MHz
Base Clock
1519 MHz
1190 MHz
Boost Clock
1531 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR5
1024bit
Memory Bus
64bit
307.2GB/s
Bandwidth
48.06GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
2
16
Compute Units
-
1024
Shading Units
256
64
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

38.08 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
24.50 GPixel/s
76.16 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.50 GTexel/s
4.874 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
12.25 GFLOPS
2.437 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
783.9 GFLOPS
152.3 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
24.50 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Vega 12
GPU Name
GP108
Vega 12 XLA
GPU Variant
N17S-G0-A1
GCN 5.0
Architecture
Pascal
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
Samsung
14 nm
Process Size
14 nm
Unknown
Transistors
1.8 billion
Unknown
Die Size
74 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
10W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
6.3
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy