Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro V320 vs Intel Arc A770

AMD Radeon Pro V320 vs Intel Arc A770

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro V320 and 16GB VRAM Arc A770 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc A770 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 60% (2400MHz vs 1500MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 483.8GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (225W vs 230W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro V320
10.75 TFLOPS
Arc A770 +82%
19.66 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2017
Release Date
Oct 2022
Radeon Pro Vega
Generation
Alchemist
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

852 MHz
Base Clock
2100 MHz
1500 MHz
Boost Clock
2400 MHz
945 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
16GB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR6
2048bit
Memory Bus
256bit
483.8GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
56
Compute Units
-
3584
Shading Units
4096
224
TMUs
256
64
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
512
-
RT Cores
32
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
16 MB

Theoretical Performance

96.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
307.2 GPixel/s
336.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
614.4 GTexel/s
21.50 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
39.32 TFLOPS
10.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
19.66 TFLOPS
672.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Vega 10
GPU Name
DG2-512
Vega 10 XL GL SERVER (215-0894144)
GPU Variant
ACM-G10
GCN 5.0
Architecture
Generation 12.7
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
6 nm
12.5 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
495 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²

Board Design

230W
TDP
225W
550 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 2.0
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy