Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro 460 vs AMD Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition

AMD Radeon Pro 460 vs AMD Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro 460 and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro 460 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock907MHz
Lower TDP (35W vs 250W)
AMD Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (174.7GB/s vs 81.28GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro 460
1.858 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition +100%
3.723 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2016
Release Date
May 2015
Radeon Pro Mac
Generation
Crystal System
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

850 MHz
Base Clock
-
907 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1270 MHz
Memory Clock
1365 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
81.28GB/s
Bandwidth
174.7GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
16
Compute Units
32
1024
Shading Units
2048
64
TMUs
128
16
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

14.51 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.09 GPixel/s
58.05 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
116.4 GTexel/s
1.858 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
3.723 TFLOPS
1.858 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.723 TFLOPS
116.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
232.7 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Baffin
GPU Name
Amethyst
Baffin XT
GPU Variant
Amethyst XT
GCN 4.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3 billion
Transistors
5 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²

Board Design

35W
TDP
250W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy