Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Instinct MI250 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2200M

AMD Radeon Instinct MI250 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2200M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 128GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI250 and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2200M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Instinct MI250 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
12672 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K2200M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Instinct MI250 +5199%
45.26 TFLOPS
Quadro K2200M
0.854 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2021
Release Date
Jul 2014
Radeon Instinct
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1700 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1600 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

128GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
8192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
3277GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
208
Compute Units
-
13312
Shading Units
640
832
TMUs
40
0
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
16 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.67 GPixel/s
1414 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
26.68 GTexel/s
362.1 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
45.26 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
853.8 GFLOPS
45.26 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
26.68 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Aldebaran
GPU Name
GM107
Aldebaran
GPU Variant
-
CDNA 2.0
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
58.2 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
Unknown
Die Size
148 mm²

Board Design

500W
TDP
65W
900 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 (11_0)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.0
N/A
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy