Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon HD 7950 vs ATI FirePro V3800

AMD Radeon HD 7950 vs ATI FirePro V3800

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM Radeon HD 7950 and 512MB VRAM FirePro V3800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon HD 7950 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 9 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
1392 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V3800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (43W vs 200W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 7950 +451%
2.867 TFLOPS
FirePro V3800
0.52 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2012
Release Date
Apr 2010
Southern Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
28
Compute Units
5
1792
Shading Units
400
112
TMUs
20
32
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
768 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB

Theoretical Performance

25.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.200 GPixel/s
89.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
2.867 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
520.0 GFLOPS
716.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
Redwood
Tahiti PRO (215-0821056)
GPU Variant
Redwood PRO GL
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
0.627 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
104 mm²

Board Design

200W
TDP
43W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy