Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon E9550 MXM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 260M

AMD Radeon E9550 MXM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 260M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon E9550 MXM and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 260M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon E9550 MXM 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1266MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 57.60GB/s)
2208 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 260M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (38W vs 95W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon E9550 MXM +2109%
5.834 TFLOPS
GeForce GTS 260M
0.264 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2016
Release Date
Jun 2009
Embedded
Generation
GeForce 200M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1120 MHz
Base Clock
-
1266 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
57.60GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
12
36
Compute Units
-
2304
Shading Units
96
144
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB

Theoretical Performance

40.51 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.400 GPixel/s
182.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.60 GTexel/s
5.834 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.834 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
264.0 GFLOPS
364.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Ellesmere
GPU Name
GT215
Ellesmere XT
GPU Variant
N10E-GS
GCN 4.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
40 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
0.727 billion
232 mm²
Die Size
144 mm²

Board Design

95W
TDP
38W
-
Suggested PSU
-
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
6.4
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy