Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon E9175 PCIe vs AMD Radeon R5 M255

AMD Radeon E9175 PCIe vs AMD Radeon R5 M255

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon E9175 PCIe and 2GB VRAM Radeon R5 M255 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon E9175 PCIe 's Advantages
Released 3 years late
Boost Clock has increased by 30% (1219MHz vs 940MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
128 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon E9175 PCIe +73%
1.248 TFLOPS
Radeon R5 M255
0.721 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2017
Release Date
Oct 2014
Embedded
Generation
Gem System
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1124 MHz
Base Clock
925 MHz
1219 MHz
Boost Clock
940 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
32.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
8
Compute Units
6
512
Shading Units
384
32
TMUs
24
16
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

19.50 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.520 GPixel/s
39.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
22.56 GTexel/s
1248 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
721.9 GFLOPS
1248 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
721.9 GFLOPS
78.02 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
45.12 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Lexa
GPU Name
Topaz
E9170
GPU Variant
Topaz PRO (216-0858030)
GCN 4.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.2 billion
Transistors
1.55 billion
103 mm²
Die Size
125 mm²

Board Design

50W
TDP
Unknown
-
Suggested PSU
-
5x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.2.170
-
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy