Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon E9172 MXM vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64

AMD Radeon E9172 MXM vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon E9172 MXM and 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro Vega 64 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon E9172 MXM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 250W)
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 11% (1350MHz vs 1219MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (402.4GB/s vs 48.00GB/s)
3584 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon E9172 MXM
1.248 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro Vega 64 +786%
11.06 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2017
Release Date
Jun 2017
Embedded
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1124 MHz
Base Clock
1250 MHz
1219 MHz
Boost Clock
1350 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
786 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
64bit
Memory Bus
2048bit
48.00GB/s
Bandwidth
402.4GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
8
Compute Units
64
512
Shading Units
4096
32
TMUs
256
16
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB

Theoretical Performance

19.50 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
86.40 GPixel/s
39.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
345.6 GTexel/s
1248 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
22.12 TFLOPS
1248 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
11.06 TFLOPS
78.02 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
691.2 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Lexa
GPU Name
Vega 10
E9170
GPU Variant
Vega 10 XT (215-0894200)
GCN 4.0
Architecture
GCN 5.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
14 nm
Process Size
14 nm
2.2 billion
Transistors
12.5 billion
103 mm²
Die Size
495 mm²

Board Design

35W
TDP
250W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy