Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon E9171 MCM vs AMD Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition

AMD Radeon E9171 MCM vs AMD Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon E9171 MCM and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon E9171 MCM 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1219MHz
Lower TDP (40W vs 250W)
AMD Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (174.3GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon E9171 MCM
1.248 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition +179%
3.482 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2017
Release Date
Nov 2014
Embedded
Generation
Crystal System
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1124 MHz
Base Clock
-
1219 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1362 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
174.3GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
8
Compute Units
32
512
Shading Units
2048
32
TMUs
128
16
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

19.50 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
27.20 GPixel/s
39.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
108.8 GTexel/s
1248 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
3.482 TFLOPS
1248 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.482 TFLOPS
78.02 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
217.6 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Lexa
GPU Name
Amethyst
Lexa MCM Pro
GPU Variant
Amethyst XT
GCN 4.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.2 billion
Transistors
5 billion
103 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²

Board Design

40W
TDP
250W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy