Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive vs NVIDIA Quadro 410

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive vs NVIDIA Quadro 410

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 24GB VRAM Quadro RTX 6000 Passive and 512MB VRAM Quadro 410 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive 's Advantages
Released 6 years late
Boost Clock1560MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 14.26GB/s)
4416 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 410 's Advantages
Lower TDP (38W vs 260W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 6000 Passive +5206%
14.38 TFLOPS
Quadro 410
0.271 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2018
Release Date
Aug 2012
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1305 MHz
Base Clock
-
1560 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
891 MHz

Memory

24GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
672.0GB/s
Bandwidth
14.26GB/s

Render Config

72
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
4608
Shading Units
192
288
TMUs
16
96
ROPs
8
576
Tensor Cores
-
72
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
6 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB

Theoretical Performance

149.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.824 GPixel/s
449.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
11.30 GTexel/s
28.75 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.38 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
271.1 GFLOPS
449.3 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
11.30 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

TU102
GPU Name
GK107
TU102-875-A1
GPU Variant
GK107-810-A2
Turing
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
18.6 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
754 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Board Design

260W
TDP
38W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
7.5
CUDA
3.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy