Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 24GB VRAM Quadro RTX 6000 Mobile and 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 290 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1455MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
4592 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 6000 Mobile +46141%
13.41 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 290
0.029 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2019
Release Date
Oct 2007
Quadro Turing-M
Generation
Quadro NVS
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1275 MHz
Base Clock
-
1455 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

24GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR2
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
672.0GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

72
SM Count
2
-
Compute Units
-
4608
Shading Units
16
288
TMUs
8
96
ROPs
4
576
Tensor Cores
-
72
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
6 MB
L2 Cache
16 KB

Theoretical Performance

139.7 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.836 GPixel/s
419.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.672 GTexel/s
26.82 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
13.41 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
29.38 GFLOPS
419.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

TU102
GPU Name
G86
-
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
80 nm
18.6 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
754 mm²
Die Size
127 mm²

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
21W
-
Suggested PSU
200 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
1x DMS-59
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.1
6.7
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy