Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 vs NVIDIA Quadro 3000M

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 vs NVIDIA Quadro 3000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Quadro RTX 5000 and 2GB VRAM Quadro 3000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1815MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
2832 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 3000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 230W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 5000 +2481%
11.15 TFLOPS
Quadro 3000M
0.432 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2018
Release Date
Feb 2011
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1620 MHz
Base Clock
-
1815 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
625 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
80.00GB/s

Render Config

48
SM Count
5
-
Compute Units
-
3072
Shading Units
240
192
TMUs
40
64
ROPs
32
384
Tensor Cores
-
48
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

116.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.500 GPixel/s
348.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
18.00 GTexel/s
22.30 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
11.15 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
432.0 GFLOPS
348.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
36.00 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

TU104
GPU Name
GF104
TU104-875-A1
GPU Variant
N12E-Q1-A1
Turing
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
13.6 billion
Transistors
1.95 billion
545 mm²
Die Size
332 mm²

Board Design

230W
TDP
75W
550 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x DisplayPort 1.4a 1x USB Type-C
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
2.1
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy