Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q vs NVIDIA Tesla K20c

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q vs NVIDIA Tesla K20c

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q and 5GB VRAM Tesla K20c to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1215MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 5GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 208.0GB/s)
Lower TDP (60W vs 225W)
NVIDIA Tesla K20c 's Advantages
576 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q +32%
4.666 TFLOPS
Tesla K20c
3.524 TFLOPS
OctaneBench
Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q
34
Tesla K20c +61%
55
VS

Graphics Card

May 2019
Release Date
Nov 2012
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

600 MHz
Base Clock
-
1215 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1300 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
5GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
320bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
208.0GB/s

Render Config

30
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
1920
Shading Units
2496
120
TMUs
208
64
ROPs
40
240
Tensor Cores
-
30
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
3 MB
L2 Cache
1280 KB

Theoretical Performance

77.76 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
36.71 GPixel/s
145.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
146.8 GTexel/s
9.331 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.666 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.524 TFLOPS
145.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1175 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

TU106
GPU Name
GK110
-
GPU Variant
GK110-885-KA-A1
Turing
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
10.8 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
445 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²

Board Design

60W
TDP
225W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
7.5
CUDA
3.5
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy