Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q vs NVIDIA Quadro K620

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q vs NVIDIA Quadro K620

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q and 2GB VRAM Quadro K620 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 8% (1215MHz vs 1124MHz)
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K620 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 60W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q +440%
4.666 TFLOPS
Quadro K620
0.863 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2019
Release Date
Jul 2014
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

600 MHz
Base Clock
1058 MHz
1215 MHz
Boost Clock
1124 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

30
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
1920
Shading Units
384
120
TMUs
24
64
ROPs
16
240
Tensor Cores
-
30
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
3 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

77.76 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.98 GPixel/s
145.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
26.98 GTexel/s
9.331 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.666 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
863.2 GFLOPS
145.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
26.98 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

TU106
GPU Name
GM107
-
GPU Variant
GM107-850-A2
Turing
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
10.8 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
445 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²

Board Design

60W
TDP
45W
-
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
5.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy