Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P620 vs NVIDIA Quadro K1200

NVIDIA Quadro P620 vs NVIDIA Quadro K1200

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro P620 and 4GB VRAM Quadro K1200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P620 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 20% (1354MHz vs 1124MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.13GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
Lower TDP (40W vs 45W)
NVIDIA Quadro K1200 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P620 +20%
1.386 TFLOPS
Quadro K1200
1.151 TFLOPS
Blender
Quadro P620
125
Quadro K1200 +4%
131
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2018
Release Date
Jan 2015
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1266 MHz
Base Clock
1058 MHz
1354 MHz
Boost Clock
1124 MHz
1252 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
80.13GB/s
Bandwidth
80.00GB/s

Render Config

4
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
512
Shading Units
512
32
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

21.66 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.98 GPixel/s
43.33 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
35.97 GTexel/s
21.66 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1386 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1151 GFLOPS
43.33 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
35.97 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GP107
GPU Name
GM107
-
GPU Variant
GM107-860-A2
Pascal
Architecture
Maxwell
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.3 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
132 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²

Board Design

40W
TDP
45W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
5.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy