Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M

NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Quadro P5200 Mobile and 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 160M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1747MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (230.9GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
2552 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (12W vs 100W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P5200 Mobile +38791%
8.945 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 160M
0.023 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2018
Release Date
Aug 2008
Quadro Mobile
Generation
NVS Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-I

Clock Speeds

1557 MHz
Base Clock
-
1747 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1804 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
230.9GB/s
Bandwidth
11.20GB/s

Render Config

20
SM Count
1
-
Compute Units
-
2560
Shading Units
8
160
TMUs
4
64
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
16 KB

Theoretical Performance

111.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.320 GPixel/s
279.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.320 GTexel/s
139.8 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.945 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
23.20 GFLOPS
279.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GP104
GPU Name
G98
-
GPU Variant
NB9M-GS
Pascal
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
65 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
314 mm²
Die Size
86 mm²

Board Design

100W
TDP
12W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
1.1
6.4
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy