Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro P600

NVIDIA Quadro P2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro P600

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 5GB VRAM Quadro P2000 and 2GB VRAM Quadro P600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P2000 's Advantages
More VRAM (5GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (140.2GB/s vs 64.13GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro P600 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 5% (1557MHz vs 1480MHz)
Lower TDP (40W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P2000 +153%
3.031 TFLOPS
Quadro P600
1.196 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2017
Release Date
Feb 2017
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1076 MHz
Base Clock
1329 MHz
1480 MHz
Boost Clock
1557 MHz
1752 MHz
Memory Clock
1002 MHz

Memory

5GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
160bit
Memory Bus
128bit
140.2GB/s
Bandwidth
64.13GB/s

Render Config

8
SM Count
3
-
Compute Units
-
1024
Shading Units
384
64
TMUs
24
40
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
1280 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

59.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
24.91 GPixel/s
94.72 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
37.37 GTexel/s
47.36 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
18.68 GFLOPS
3.031 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1196 GFLOPS
94.72 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
37.37 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GP106
GPU Name
GP107
GP106-875-A1
GPU Variant
-
Pascal
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
16 nm
Process Size
14 nm
4.4 billion
Transistors
3.3 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
132 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
40W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
6.1
6.4
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy