Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile vs Intel Arctic Sound 2T

NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile vs Intel Arctic Sound 2T

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 0GB VRAM Quadro P2000 Mobile and 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 2T to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Boost Clock1291MHz
Lower TDP (75W vs 500W)
Intel Arctic Sound 2T 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 11 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 96.13GB/s)
6528 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P2000 Mobile
2.974 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound 2T +364%
13.82 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2019
Release Date
Jan 2021
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Xe Graphics
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1291 MHz
Base Clock
-
1291 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
96.13GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s

Render Config

9
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
1152
Shading Units
7680
72
TMUs
240
32
ROPs
120
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1280 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB

Theoretical Performance

41.31 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
108.0 GPixel/s
92.95 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
216.0 GTexel/s
46.48 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
27.65 TFLOPS
2.974 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.82 TFLOPS
92.95 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
3.456 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GP106
GPU Name
Arctic Sound
-
GPU Variant
-
Pascal
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
16 nm
Process Size
10 nm
4.4 billion
Transistors
8 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
190 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
500W
-
Suggested PSU
900 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy