Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile vs NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 16

NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile vs NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 16

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro M620 Mobile and 16GB VRAM GRID RTX T10 16 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 260W)
NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 16 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 43% (1395MHz vs 977MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (604.8GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
4096 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M620 Mobile
1 TFLOPS
GRID RTX T10 16 +1186%
12.86 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2017
Release Date
Unknown
Quadro Mobile
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

756 MHz
Base Clock
1065 MHz
977 MHz
Boost Clock
1395 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1575 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
604.8GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
72
-
Compute Units
-
512
Shading Units
4608
32
TMUs
288
16
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
576
-
RT Cores
72
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
6 MB

Theoretical Performance

15.63 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
133.9 GPixel/s
31.26 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
401.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
25.71 TFLOPS
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.86 TFLOPS
31.26 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
401.8 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
TU102
-
GPU Variant
TU102-875-A1
Maxwell
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²

Board Design

30W
TDP
260W
-
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy