Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M5000M vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000M

NVIDIA Quadro M5000M vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro M5000M and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M5000M 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.4GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
1152 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K2000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 100W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M5000M +423%
2.995 TFLOPS
Quadro K2000M
0.572 TFLOPS
Blender
Quadro M5000M +685%
275
Quadro K2000M
35
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2015
Release Date
Jun 2012
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
160.4GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
1536
Shading Units
384
96
TMUs
32
64
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

62.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.960 GPixel/s
93.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
23.84 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
2.995 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
572.2 GFLOPS
93.60 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
23.84 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GM204
GPU Name
GK107
N16E-Q5-A1
GPU Variant
N14P-Q3-A2
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5.2 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
398 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Board Design

100W
TDP
55W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
5.2
CUDA
3.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy