Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M5000 vs NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216

NVIDIA Quadro M5000 vs NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro M5000 and 32GB VRAM Tesla PG503 216 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M5000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 250W)
NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 47% (1530MHz vs 1038MHz)
More VRAM (32GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1133GB/s vs 211.6GB/s)
3072 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M5000
4.252 TFLOPS
Tesla PG503 216 +268%
15.67 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2015
Release Date
Nov 2019
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

861 MHz
Base Clock
1312 MHz
1038 MHz
Boost Clock
1530 MHz
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
1106 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
211.6GB/s
Bandwidth
1133GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
80
-
Compute Units
-
2048
Shading Units
5120
128
TMUs
320
64
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
640
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
6 MB

Theoretical Performance

66.43 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
195.8 GPixel/s
132.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
489.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
31.33 TFLOPS
4.252 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
15.67 TFLOPS
132.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
7.834 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GM204
GPU Name
GV100
GM204-875-A1
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Volta
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
5.2 billion
Transistors
21.1 billion
398 mm²
Die Size
815 mm²

Board Design

150W
TDP
250W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.2
CUDA
7.0
6.4
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy