Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M4000M vs NVIDIA Tesla C2050

NVIDIA Quadro M4000M vs NVIDIA Tesla C2050

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M4000M and 3GB VRAM Tesla C2050 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M4000M 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.4GB/s vs 144.0GB/s)
832 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (100W vs 238W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M4000M +142%
2.496 TFLOPS
Tesla C2050
1.028 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2015
Release Date
Jul 2011
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
750 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
160.4GB/s
Bandwidth
144.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
14
-
Compute Units
-
1280
Shading Units
448
80
TMUs
56
64
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB

Theoretical Performance

62.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.07 GPixel/s
78.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.14 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
2.496 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1028 GFLOPS
78.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
513.9 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GM204
GPU Name
GF100
N16E-Q3-A1
GPU Variant
GF100-850-A3
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
5.2 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
398 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Board Design

100W
TDP
238W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
2.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy