Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M4000M vs NVIDIA GRID K200

NVIDIA Quadro M4000M vs NVIDIA GRID K200

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M4000M and 256MB VRAM GRID K200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M4000M 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 2 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.4GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
Lower TDP (100W vs 225W)
NVIDIA GRID K200 's Advantages
256 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M4000M +9%
2.496 TFLOPS
GRID K200
2.289 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2015
Release Date
Jun 2013
Quadro Mobile
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
160.4GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
1280
Shading Units
1536
80
TMUs
128
64
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

62.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.84 GPixel/s
78.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
95.36 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
2.496 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.289 TFLOPS
78.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
95.36 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GM204
GPU Name
GK104
N16E-Q3-A1
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5.2 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
398 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Board Design

100W
TDP
225W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
5.2
CUDA
3.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy