Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M3000M vs AMD Radeon PRO W7900

NVIDIA Quadro M3000M vs AMD Radeon PRO W7900

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M3000M and 48GB VRAM Radeon PRO W7900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M3000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 295W)
AMD Radeon PRO W7900 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock2495MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (864.0GB/s vs 160.4GB/s)
5120 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M3000M
2.15 TFLOPS
Radeon PRO W7900 +2752%
61.32 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2015
Release Date
Apr 2023
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Radeon Pro Navi
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1855 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2495 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
160.4GB/s
Bandwidth
864.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
96
1024
Shading Units
6144
64
TMUs
384
32
ROPs
192
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
96
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
256 KB per Array
2 MB
L2 Cache
6 MB

Theoretical Performance

33.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
479.0 GPixel/s
67.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
958.1 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
122.6 TFLOPS
2.150 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
61.32 TFLOPS
67.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1.916 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GM204
GPU Name
Navi 31
N16E-Q1-A1
GPU Variant
Navi 31
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
5.2 billion
Transistors
57.7 billion
398 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
295W
-
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
3x DisplayPort 2.1 1x mini-DisplayPort 2.1
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.2
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy